BRIEFLY APPLYING A DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/341-briefly-applying-a-decision-making-framework.html

 

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Briefly Applying a Decision-Making Framework

Answer the three questions following the Management Choice Ethics Case on p. 288
(Ch. 4) of the text.
· Describe what Sue should do and the decision-making approach that supports such
action when responding to question 3. The steps summarized in Figure 5.5 on p. 353
(Ch. 5) may help guide your answer to question 3. Justify your decision based on the
impact it would have on the stakeholders involved in the situation using terminology and
concepts from Ch. 5.
· Post your response in 200 to 300 words.

 

FULLY APPLYING A DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/340-fully-applying-a-decision-making-framework.html

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Fully Applying a Decision-Making Framework

Read the Locker Room Talk Ethics Case on p. 284 (Ch. 4) of the text. 
• Analyze the case using stakeholder impact analysis and the philosophical approaches to ethical decision making. 
• Explain what you think Albert should do in a 700- to 1,050-word paper. 
• Organize your paper using the following section outlines. Review the questions for each section to help you analyze the case and frame your paper. (Do not explicitly answer these questions within the body of your paper.) 

 

PRESENTATION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS POSITIONS – RESIDENTS OF RIVERSIDE

 

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/339-presentation-of-the-stakeholders-positions-residents-of-riverside.html

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Presentation of the Stakeholders Positions – Residents of Riverside

Presentation of the Stakeholders Positions – Residents of Riverside

 

PRESENTATION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS POSITIONS – KARDELL LEGAL COUNSEL

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/338-presentation-of-the-stakeholders-positions-kardell-legal-counsel.html

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Presentation of the Stakeholders Positions – Kardell Legal Counsel

 

Discuss within your group how best to represent your position and desires. The discussion could provide you with ideas for how to be persuasive and how to communicate the potential impact of Kardell’s actions on your stakeholder group. You are not required to discuss, but are encouraged to take advantage of the opportunity.

 

Prepare, individually, a presentation that represents your assigned stakeholder group’s concerns and wishes for the company. Compose your presentation as though you were to deliver it to the entire board of directors of the Kardell Paper Co.

 

Write your presentation in 200 to 300 words using Microsoft® Word.

 

PRESENTATION OF THE CEOS POSITION

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/337-presentation-of-the-ceos-position.html

 

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Presentation of the CEOs Position

Review the anonymous stakeholder presentations your instructor has posted. There is likely to be repetition among the presentations from the same group, so mentally synthesize the presentations into four positions, one for each group. You might find it helpful to take notes. 
• Complete the Stakeholder Analysis Table found in Appendix C based on your synthesis. 
• Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you assume the role of Kardell’s CEO. As CEO, critically examine each stakeholder position in light of the facts of the case. 
• Consider the strengths and weaknesses of each stakeholder position, especially how their desires for action could impact the company’s profitability. Then, select a course of action from the following list:

 

APPROACHES TO STAKEHOLDER IMPACT ANALYSIS

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/336-approaches-to-stakeholder-impact-analysis.html

 

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Approaches to Stakeholder Impact Analysis

Describe how you might conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 of
Appendix B using each of the stakeholder impact analysis approaches: moral standards,
5-question, and Pastin’s approach. Note: You are not required to analyze the impact on
each stakeholder.
· Post your description in 200 to 300 words.

 

CRITIQUING PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO ETHICAL DECISION MAKING

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/335-critiquing-philosophical-approaches-to-ethical-decision-making.html

 

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making

Although there are many different methods by which to determine an appropriate ethical course of action in a situation, not every method is effective in all situations. Not all ethical frameworks are equally useful. Beyond knowing how to use a particular ethical framework, the ability to evaluate a framework for appropriateness is also beneficial. 
• Resource: Appendix B 
• Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum] 
• Review each of the responses you wrote in Appendix B. 
• Write a 900- to 1,350-word paper in which you critique each of the philosophical approaches for each of the scenarios in Appendix B. Evaluate whether or not the course of action you chose for the Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making CheckPoint really is ethical and whether or not the reasoning for that course of action makes sense. Ask yourself the following questions: 

 

PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO ETHICAL DECISION MAKING

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/334-appendix-b-philosophical-approaches-to-ethical-decision-making.html

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making

Determine the ethical course of action for the following three scenarios from the perspective of each of the three philosophical approaches: consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Then, complete the matrix below by writing a few sentences stating the ethical course of action and the reasoning from that approach’s perspective. Clearly differentiate the reasons for each of the three approaches.

 

Keep in mind that, although rationale might differ, the ethical course of action for a given scenario might be the same for each philosophical approach. Be sure to state the ethical course of action as well as the rationale behind it, according to the philosophical approach.

 

Scenario 1

 

The mayor of a small seaside town faces a tough decision. A prominent developer has submitted a proposal to build a large mall and resort in the town. This development is estimated to bring $150 million in tourism each year and several hundred new jobs to the community, which badly needs the economic boost. The proposed location of the new development, however, is a site that now houses the only nursing home and senior citizens’ recreation center in the area. Both the nursing home and recreation center would have to be demolished, affecting 100 seniors and 30 employees. There is no other location in town where the new development can be built. How should the mayor decide: in favor of economic prosperity or in defense of his elderly citizens?

 

Scenario 2

 

Catalina works for a regional sales branch of a large pharmaceutical company. Individual employees as well as the entire branch receive incentive packages if they reach certain sales goals. If a sales rep meets his or her individual goals, he or she receives a large bonus check at the end of the year. Likewise, if all the sales reps meet their goals, the entire branch receives brand new equipment, vacation packages, and larger bonuses.

 

It is two weeks until the end of the fiscal year, when reps report their sales. Every sales rep in the branch has met his or her individual sales goal, except Catalina; she is three sales short. A friend encourages her to report three additional sales and then, come next year, report that three of her sales had been cancelled. “There’s a loophole in the company policy that makes it so they can’t take away your bonus after you’ve already received it,” her friend tells her. “Plus, if you don’t meet your goal, none of us get new equipment or vacation. You’ll ruin it for all of us!” Should Catalina report and then cancel those three sales so she and her coworkers can receive their bonuses?

 

Scenario 3

 

Malcolm came home to his apartment one evening after a long day at work. He lives near campus with three other students at the university. Malcolm turned the corner into the kitchen to find one of his roommates sitting at the table with another man whom Malcolm didn’t recognize. On the table were several small bags of what appeared to be…drugs? It took Malcolm by surprise, so much so that he froze in his tracks. His roommate and the other man quickly stuffed the bags into a backpack, exchanged a wad of bills, and the man brushed past Malcolm and out the front door. Dumbfounded, Malcolm stared at his roommate, who approached him and, almost threateningly, said, “You didn’t see anything. Got it? Don’t think I won’t know who squealed if

 

UNETHICAL PRACTICES OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/333-unethical-practices-of-arthur-andersen.html

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

Unethical Practices of Arthur Andersen

Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Due Date: Day 4 [Individual forum]
· Read the Arthur Andersen’s Troubles Ethics Case on pp. 107-113 (Ch. 2) of the text.
· Answer questions 1, 3, and 4 on p. 113 in 200 to 300 words. When responding to
question 3, focus solely on the Enron case.

 

THE ENRON AND WORLDCOM SCANDALS

 

Purchase this tutorial here: 

http://3dollarshop.com/332-the-enron-and-worldcom-scandals.html

We have many courses of StrayerUniversity, University of Phoenix and AshfordUniversity. If you need any assistance please contact us at: http://3dollarshop.com/

We also provide custom and original papers. Email us for more information.

 

The Enron and WorldCom Scandals

Review the accounts of the Enron and WorldCom scandals in Ch. 2 of the text:

o Enron’s Questionable Transactions on pp. 96-107

o WorldCom: The Final Catalyst on pp. 114-118

Answer the following questions using complete sentences:

o Enron: 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9 on pp. 106-107

o WorldCom: 1, 3, 4, and 5 on p. 118

Post your answers as an attachment. Clearly label the case and question number for each of your responses.